Under which circumstance can an investor be liable for multiple acts of rent skimming?

The circumstance in which an investor can be liable for multiple acts of rent skimming arises when they are skimming rent from five or more parcels over a period of two years. Rent skimming typically refers to the illegal practice where a property owner collects rental income but neglects to make required mortgage payments or fulfill other financial obligations related to the property.

When an investor engages in this behavior across multiple properties and over a defined time frame, it demonstrates a pattern of disregard for financial responsibilities, which often draws the attention of regulatory bodies and legal action. This extended activity amplifies the severity of the conduct, as it suggests a broader scheme rather than isolated incidents.

Other options may involve potentially unethical or risky practices, such as renting without a lease or below market value, but they do not inherently constitute rent skimming. Similarly, owning fewer than five properties does not lead to a determination of liability for renting skimming, since the action must connect to the act of neglecting financial obligations tied to rental income across multiple properties and over time.